Non Una Cum refutation resources

Status    Subject Created By Replies Views Last Post
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Join our new Telegram group
Voxxkowalski 12 2,516 by polycarpwontburn
Mar 17, 2024 16:33:05 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling New Member Victor asking questions
Voxxkowalski 9 1,167 by RitaMarita
Sept 4, 2023 13:10:59 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling fake pharmacy sales and scams
Voxxkowalski 6 1,889 by Voxxkowalski
Jul 18, 2023 21:08:15 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Continuous Rosary on Telegram
Voxxkowalski 7 985 by Voxxkowalski
Jul 16, 2023 15:10:44 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling New Resource Subforum on Traditionalist lines
Pacelli 5 3,531 by Pacelli
Jul 15, 2023 7:56:56 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Father Kramer Interview
Voxxkowalski 7 1,930 by Pacelli
Nov 13, 2022 10:53:59 GMT -5
Thread Locked Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Roe V Wade overturned today
Voxxkowalski 0 541 by Voxxkowalski
Jun 24, 2022 18:31:40 GMT -5
Thread Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling NEW FEATURES!
Pages:
Voxxkowalski 39 4,419 by Voxxkowalski
Apr 21, 2022 4:27:55 GMT -5
Thread Locked Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Trad Catholic "Groups" BE WARNED
Voxxkowalski 1 6,452 by Voxxkowalski
Jan 15, 2018 2:07:21 GMT -5
Thread Locked Announcement  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Trad Cath Rules
Voxxkowalski 0 2,902 by Voxxkowalski
Apr 24, 2016 18:09:02 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Fr Radecki: SSPX Masses & Validity of Novus Ordo Ordinations
Pacelli 6 251 by Pacelli
Jul 8, 2024 10:11:23 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Bp McGuire claims it can be argued no grace from UCF masses
John Lewis 14 618 by Pacelli
Jun 30, 2023 5:53:28 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Undeclared Heretics: Introibo Ad Altare Dei
John Lewis 6 847 by John Lewis
Mar 31, 2023 12:36:14 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling St. Vincent Ferrer, the "Una Cum" & Pernicious Lies
Pacelli 1 412 by John Lewis
Mar 25, 2023 3:27:11 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Objections to "Vatican II, The Pope, & The Mass (Lane, 2000)
Pacelli 2 423 by Pacelli
Jan 15, 2023 9:38:14 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Reply to Grain of Incense Quote (Footnote 52)
Pacelli 6 1,120 by Deleted
Jan 13, 2023 20:58:06 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Instruction S.C. Prop Fide on Communicatio in Sacris (1729)
Pacelli 1 228 by Pacelli
Dec 30, 2022 9:07:44 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Question on the "Grain of Incense" Article
Pacelli 1 1,001 by Deleted
Dec 20, 2022 22:40:08 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling St. Hypatius Withdrawal from Communion with Nestorius
Pacelli 2 490 by RitaMarita
Oct 3, 2022 8:44:00 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Discussion on the "Grain of Incense" article
Pacelli 11 1,604 by Voxxkowalski
Sept 26, 2022 7:26:32 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling A Response to "Why CMRI is Not a Option" by S. Heiner
Pacelli 6 605 by Voxxkowalski
Apr 15, 2022 5:37:44 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Sedevacantism, the 'Una Cum' and the Church (Lane)
Pacelli 2 1,979 by Pacelli
Apr 15, 2022 15:32:28 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Response to Heiner's Article - Part II (+Pivarunas, 2022)
Pacelli 2 497 by Pacelli
Mar 28, 2022 11:38:54 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Thoughts in Regard to the “Una Cum” Issue (+Pivarunas, 2022)
Pacelli 0 214 by Pacelli
Mar 8, 2022 9:28:48 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Donating at Una Cum Masses -Refuting a False Teaching (Daly)
Pacelli 0 618 by Pacelli
Apr 7, 2021 12:49:24 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Response to the "Una Cum" Controversy (Daly, 2006)
Pacelli 1 999 by wenceslav
Mar 18, 2021 17:59:42 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling CMRI Statement on Una Cum (+Pivarunas & CMRI priests, 2002)
Pacelli 0 1,138 by Pacelli
Mar 16, 2021 17:36:21 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Attendance Una Cum Benedicto Masses (Stépanich, 2009)
Pacelli 0 484 by Pacelli
Mar 15, 2021 11:51:41 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling I refute Bishop Sanborn
Voxxkowalski 0 934 by Voxxkowalski
Mar 12, 2021 7:04:39 GMT -5
Thread  
newBookmarkLockedFalling Una Quicum (Lemoureaux, 1992)
Pacelli 1 825 by Voxxkowalski
Aug 13, 2018 13:47:45 GMT -5

Board Information & Statistics

Board Statistics
Threads and Posts
Total Threads:23
Total Posts:85
Members
On This Board
You can create threads.
You can reply to threads.
You can create polls.
Members Online
Users Viewing
0 Staff, 0 Members, 1 Guest.

Shoutbox

John Lewis: @didymus - you'll need to remember your email address and follow the password reset process Jun 18, 2024 1:54:23 GMT -5
John Lewis: www.lifesitenews.com/news/tennessee-governor-signs-bill-calling-for-30-days-of-prayer-and-fasting-in-july/ Jun 21, 2024 13:01:27 GMT -5
Reader: Hi, frequent reader here. The elections are coming up so could you please post some pre-Conciliar sources that explain why Catholics are not allowed to join political parties that support abortion, sodomy, or other violations of the moral law? Jul 22, 2024 5:08:26 GMT -5
Pacelli: Reader, the Pre-V2 sources didn't deal with joining political parties, but on the morality of voting. Jul 22, 2024 8:04:52 GMT -5
Reader: But is there anything about joining a society which supports policies or principles against the moral law, or the faith? How do I prove to my friend that it is not licit for a Catholic to join such a society (in this case it's a party) Jul 22, 2024 8:54:24 GMT -5
Reader: I know there are specific documents against joining masonic societies, but is there something in general about joining not secret but public societies which advocate principles against Catholic faith and morals? Any help is greatly appreciated. Jul 22, 2024 8:59:17 GMT -5
Pacelli: Reader, political parties cannot be confused with sects. When the Church condemned masonry and communism, they were condemned as sects. Jul 22, 2024 9:16:40 GMT -5
Reader: I don't think it's that simple because not just those but every society that demanded secrecy was condemned, regardless of its doctrine. Also, it is not a settled question whether the Communist Party is to be considered a sect in the proper sense. Jul 22, 2024 10:16:51 GMT -5
Reader: The Holy Office mentions the Communist Party, it does not state that it is a sect. Regardless, there must be some mention somewhere of joining an organization which promotes policies against the law of faith and morals, isn't there? Jul 22, 2024 10:20:37 GMT -5
Pacelli: Reader, until a sect is condemned by the Pope, a Catholic would not fall under a censure. Even if you want to try to argue that a modern political party is a sect, a Catholic would remain without censure by joining it. Jul 22, 2024 10:20:46 GMT -5
Reader: I am not talking about a censure, like excommunication. I just mean that it is a sin to join an organization that promotes the murder of unborn children, the unnatural vice and other things against the law of faith and morals... Jul 22, 2024 10:22:47 GMT -5
Reader: and I am looking for a statement by theologians or by Catholic Authority about that (even in a very general unspecific form) that I can show my friend. Jul 22, 2024 10:24:20 GMT -5
Pacelli: Reader, it doesn't exist in this situation. The political parties do not demand adherence to their platforms, so joining these parties does not indicate one accepts these ideas. Jul 22, 2024 11:23:52 GMT -5
Pacelli: There are no sources that support your thesis, and if you do find any, I would be very surprised. Jul 22, 2024 11:24:26 GMT -5
Reader: What about cooperation in evil and Romans 1:32? To become a member of a political party is to give implicit consent to their official policy, and if that policy includes promoting and voting for murder, sodomy etc., it implies agreement. Jul 22, 2024 12:07:04 GMT -5
Reader: Isn't that the reason why joining the Communist Party was always considered a sin (unless under duress), even if not every member was necessarily excommunicated - because to join the Party implies agreement with its evil doctrines. Jul 22, 2024 12:09:45 GMT -5
Reader: Romans, 1:32: "Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death: and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them." Jul 22, 2024 12:11:39 GMT -5
Pacelli: If you want to make the case based on a rigorous use of sources, I'll read it. As it stands now, I'm not seeing it. There are many problems with your idea, which is why you won't find any moralist holding it. Jul 22, 2024 12:12:07 GMT -5 *
Reader: Can you please elaborate about those problems you refer to? Jul 22, 2024 12:14:40 GMT -5
Pacelli: This would be much easier in the forum than the shoutbox. Jul 22, 2024 12:20:07 GMT -5
Shout as:
Refresh
  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Strikethrough
  • Link
  • Insert Smiley
0/256 Send Cancel