Post by pauljoseph on Feb 17, 2019 14:52:45 GMT -5
Spendthrift Sam: the ultimate 'sugar-daddy'
Major 'Ouch!' for all American citizen, bigender couples, raising children...
[For-the-record: We raised three children through college without welfare/food stamps/or Medicaid. Our 'white privilege' is buried under Sam's National Debt.]
It's NOT just illegal/legal immigration (min. $134.9 billion/yr.) (crushing)>>>WHITE men.
Stefan Molyneux©; Published on Feb 5, 2019
00:32:09 ...I mean it's gonna sound odd but but
it's hard to argue against
economically we pay women for babies all
the time--we pay women for babies all the
time; it's called the welfare state. so in
California, just for example--which has a
far more generous welfare state than
Sweden or Germany or France--in
California a woman who has two babies
under the age of five can get over
$30,000 in benefits plus another four
and a half thousand dollars in Medicare/
Medicaid, so she'd have to...like that
thirty five thousand dollars--which she
doesn't have to pay taxes on--so that's
the equivalent of fifty or fifty-five
thousand dollars in salary, right? so we
are paying her for babies already--
we're paying her for children. now I
understand it's the mom and all that but
nonetheless: we are paying money to keep
children in comfort. so if your focus is
on keeping the babies alive, which, as a
baby who was kept alive: I'm pleased that
I was and I'm sure you are as well...and
we should start to think about this...
[Elsewhere in statistic-dom: >=50% of Americans
are living on $30,000-or-less/year; 02/2019]
'Something to reflect upon, given that Demokkkrats/the uni-party hoodwinked the latest CR with 'more-of-the-same'...
"Our Lady of Gietrzwald: Pray for us!"
Major 'Ouch!' for all American citizen, bigender couples, raising children...
[For-the-record: We raised three children through college without welfare/food stamps/or Medicaid. Our 'white privilege' is buried under Sam's National Debt.]
It's NOT just illegal/legal immigration (min. $134.9 billion/yr.) (crushing)>>>
Stefan Molyneux©; Published on Feb 5, 2019
00:32:09 ...I mean it's gonna sound odd but but
it's hard to argue against
economically we pay women for babies all
the time--we pay women for babies all the
time; it's called the welfare state. so in
California, just for example--which has a
far more generous welfare state than
Sweden or Germany or France--in
California a woman who has two babies
under the age of five can get over
$30,000 in benefits plus another four
and a half thousand dollars in Medicare/
Medicaid, so she'd have to...like that
thirty five thousand dollars--which she
doesn't have to pay taxes on--so that's
the equivalent of fifty or fifty-five
thousand dollars in salary, right? so we
are paying her for babies already--
we're paying her for children. now I
understand it's the mom and all that but
nonetheless: we are paying money to keep
children in comfort. so if your focus is
on keeping the babies alive, which, as a
baby who was kept alive: I'm pleased that
I was and I'm sure you are as well...and
we should start to think about this...
[Elsewhere in statistic-dom: >=50% of Americans
are living on $30,000-or-less/year; 02/2019]
'Something to reflect upon, given that Demokkkrats/the uni-party hoodwinked the latest CR with 'more-of-the-same'...
"Our Lady of Gietrzwald: Pray for us!"