|
|
Post by Pacelli on Apr 13, 2018 15:21:05 GMT -5
For those who remember the case of the Stanley’s who had their children taken by the state based on untrue accusations, the Stanley’s case against the state of Alabama is now working its way through the federal courts. This is the latest with arguments put forth by the Stanley’s lawyer and the state attorney defending the actions to the 8th Circuit Court. It’s interesting to listen to the state’s arguments to see how warped the thinking is in justifying taking a child out of a home with loving parents, where no abuse or neglect has been proven, and is in no immediate danger. media-oa.ca8.uscourts.gov/OAaudio/2018/4/172702.MP3 (audio only) |
|
|
|
Post by heinrich on Apr 20, 2018 20:54:39 GMT -5
Thanks for the update. Will be in intentions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacelli on Aug 12, 2018 7:18:11 GMT -5
Update: the eighth circuit court of appeals just ruled on the matter of whether those who took the Stanley’s kids could claim immunity and thereby end the case. The court ruled against the plaintiff, so the case will continue. This is a victory for the Stanley’s and all parents of minor children throughout America, who want to raise their children in peace, and free of government interference The ruling can be found here: media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/172702P.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by Voxxkowalski on Aug 12, 2018 9:30:52 GMT -5
Update: the eighth circuit court of appeals just ruled on the matter of whether those who took the Stanley’s kids could claim immunity and thereby end the case. The court ruled against the plaintiff, so the case will continue. This is a victory for the Stanley’s and all parents of minor children throughout America, who want to raise their children in peace, and free of government interference The ruling can be found here: media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/172702P.pdfThis should be front page landmark civil rights news. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacelli on Aug 12, 2018 16:01:32 GMT -5
Update: the eighth circuit court of appeals just ruled on the matter of whether those who took the Stanley’s kids could claim immunity and thereby end the case. The court ruled against the plaintiff, so the case will continue. This is a victory for the Stanley’s and all parents of minor children throughout America, who want to raise their children in peace, and free of government interference The ruling can be found here: media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/172702P.pdfThis should be front page landmark civil rights news. I agree, it’s a huge win, although it doesn’t end the case, at least it establishes that government personnel cannot hide behind immunity for their misdeeds. It’s a strange thing in this case that CPS actually did not want to take these children, and the fault for this mess was with the police and their “specialist” that worked for them who in essence forced CPS to take the kids. |
|
|
|
Post by Voxxkowalski on Aug 13, 2018 13:19:16 GMT -5
Yes I noted that...AND the judus teenager. |
|
