Post by Pacelli on Nov 3, 2019 14:48:08 GMT -5
We have now put up a Resource forum, as opposed to a discussion forum for resources that support the proposition that the alleged Popes, Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis were not at all popes of the Catholic Church.
All of the information in this forum can be found online, but I have decided to begin collecting it here, so there can be a one stop location to find the ever numerous amount of evidence that shows that these supposed popes were not popes at all, as they were and are not Catholics.
As an observation, it seems clear to me that there is a clear modus operandi to the actions of these men. They all believe that public prayer with non-Catholics is not only permissible, but is something good and to be encouraged. I also believe that this belief is not stable, but is getting continually more radical. Paul VI clearly believed in interfaith prayer, and even approved of intercommunion with the orthodox and Protestants, which in itself is a break from Catholic teaching and Tradition, but he did not go as far as John Paul, Benedict XVI and Francis, who have also promoted interfaith prayer with the unbaptized pagans.
Francis, in my opinion, has taken this even one step further, by allowing the Italian bishops to approve and publish a prayer to a false god, and allowing processions and veneration of the idol to take place in Rome and even in Roman churches. This same idol, Pachamama was adored by having a hymn sung to it in a Cathedral in Lima, Peru, with no intervention from Rome. The final proof of Francis direct complicity was a stamens Meade by him apologizing for the actions of Catholics who threw these idols into the Tiber River. In that statement, Francis admits that he knew these statutes were of the false god Pachamama, putting to rest any potential argument that he didn’t know these were idols.
My hope for this subforum will be to show that there is clear evidence of heresy and apostasy on the part of these men. I hope to connect the dots, so to speak, between Paul VI to Francis demonstrating that their actions are all one of the same, a new religion, a new sect, and one that is certainly not the Catholic Church.
One last point worth mentioning, years ago, when one tried to say expose these things about John Paul II to other Catholics, there was disbelief, and accusations against the accused that we were misrepresenting the evidence and that he was a good pope. I even experienced anger and aggression by these people who would not hear the insuperable facts. I was accused of using photoshopped pictures of John Paul kissing the Koran and other acts of apostasy. Catholics at the time just could not believe these facts, and their response was to defend him at all costs. As time has past, now decades, I think this knee jerk defense of these papal claimants is not happening anymore. I see this especially with Francis. It seems to me that the remaining Catholics mired in with this sect are no longer jumping to the defense of the antipope, currently Francis, they are now accepting the facts of the matter, his acts of apostasy, they are just wrestling with how to react as Catholics. This is clear progress.
If anyone wants to discuss anything that is posted on that subforum, feel free to start a new thread here on this discussion forum.
All of the information in this forum can be found online, but I have decided to begin collecting it here, so there can be a one stop location to find the ever numerous amount of evidence that shows that these supposed popes were not popes at all, as they were and are not Catholics.
As an observation, it seems clear to me that there is a clear modus operandi to the actions of these men. They all believe that public prayer with non-Catholics is not only permissible, but is something good and to be encouraged. I also believe that this belief is not stable, but is getting continually more radical. Paul VI clearly believed in interfaith prayer, and even approved of intercommunion with the orthodox and Protestants, which in itself is a break from Catholic teaching and Tradition, but he did not go as far as John Paul, Benedict XVI and Francis, who have also promoted interfaith prayer with the unbaptized pagans.
Francis, in my opinion, has taken this even one step further, by allowing the Italian bishops to approve and publish a prayer to a false god, and allowing processions and veneration of the idol to take place in Rome and even in Roman churches. This same idol, Pachamama was adored by having a hymn sung to it in a Cathedral in Lima, Peru, with no intervention from Rome. The final proof of Francis direct complicity was a stamens Meade by him apologizing for the actions of Catholics who threw these idols into the Tiber River. In that statement, Francis admits that he knew these statutes were of the false god Pachamama, putting to rest any potential argument that he didn’t know these were idols.
My hope for this subforum will be to show that there is clear evidence of heresy and apostasy on the part of these men. I hope to connect the dots, so to speak, between Paul VI to Francis demonstrating that their actions are all one of the same, a new religion, a new sect, and one that is certainly not the Catholic Church.
One last point worth mentioning, years ago, when one tried to say expose these things about John Paul II to other Catholics, there was disbelief, and accusations against the accused that we were misrepresenting the evidence and that he was a good pope. I even experienced anger and aggression by these people who would not hear the insuperable facts. I was accused of using photoshopped pictures of John Paul kissing the Koran and other acts of apostasy. Catholics at the time just could not believe these facts, and their response was to defend him at all costs. As time has past, now decades, I think this knee jerk defense of these papal claimants is not happening anymore. I see this especially with Francis. It seems to me that the remaining Catholics mired in with this sect are no longer jumping to the defense of the antipope, currently Francis, they are now accepting the facts of the matter, his acts of apostasy, they are just wrestling with how to react as Catholics. This is clear progress.
If anyone wants to discuss anything that is posted on that subforum, feel free to start a new thread here on this discussion forum.