|
Post by Pacelli on May 2, 2022 14:00:46 GMT -5
On Heresy and Heretical Popes - Against John Salza and Robert Siscoe
Eric Holye, May 2022
Ed: link removed, as the paper is no longer found at this link.
|
|
|
Post by marcellusfaber on Jun 10, 2023 13:09:17 GMT -5
Is it possible to see the original document which Mr Hoyle wrote before his change of opinion and subsequent revision?
|
|
|
Post by Didymus on Jun 10, 2023 17:02:31 GMT -5
Pacelli may I ask for the context of this? I translated it into Spanish but it was not clear to me
|
|
|
Post by Pacelli on Jun 11, 2023 9:57:53 GMT -5
Is it possible to see the original document which Mr Hoyle wrote before his change of opinion and subsequent revision? The author removed the paper and replaced it with an explanation. Only he would have the original, and he is a member here, so if you want, you can ask him directly. I thought his paper was good, so that is why I posted it. I will be removing the link, as the text I linked is no longer there. One last comment, I like and think well of Eric. He, in my opinion, in his fairly recent grasping of various Catholic teachings that he was not acquainted with previously, has drawn conclusions from this new understanding that I believe are unwarranted by the evidence. The idea of embracing the Conciliar sect as the Catholic Church may solve one problem, namely the apostolic succession, but it doesn't solve all of the other problems that arise if this sect is the Catholic Church. In regards to the Apostolic Succession, there is another explanation that is in harmony with Catholic doctrine, and all of the sources, including Mazella, but at the same time rejects the Conciliar sect and the line of undeclared antipopes from Paul VI to Francis.
|
|
|
Post by Pacelli on Jun 11, 2023 10:00:26 GMT -5
Pacelli may I ask for the context of this? I translated it into Spanish but it was not clear to me Eric Hoyle was refuting the errors of Sisco and Salza. I can't remember off hand what he was writing on since it's been a while since I read it. The link now leads to Eric's statement on his current thinking, not the paper he wrote.
|
|
|
Post by Didymus on Jun 11, 2023 12:29:40 GMT -5
Pacelli may I ask for the context of this? I translated it into Spanish but it was not clear to me Eric Hoyle was refuting the errors of Sisco and Salza. I can't remember off hand what he was writing on since it's been a while since I read it. The link now leads to Eric's statement on his current thinking, not the paper he wrote. That was precisely what did not make sense to me since he says that sedevacantism is no longer his position. Thank you !
|
|
|
Post by Pacelli on Jun 11, 2023 18:20:57 GMT -5
Eric Hoyle was refuting the errors of Sisco and Salza. I can't remember off hand what he was writing on since it's been a while since I read it. The link now leads to Eric's statement on his current thinking, not the paper he wrote. That was precisely what did not make sense to me since he says that sedevacantism is no longer his position. Thank you ! You're welcome.
|
|